Who can see your viewing activity?
For the basis of technical review and models Management of process, I find the MBSE push is going in company but review of a function or element is not in the model. Models are used to generate the documents and specifications(feed the documents with a structure) and this makes consistent documents for help, but its not model or MBSE to review designs or manage process. Perhaps its a step towards MBSE if your optimist or realist that its a transition and company will get to MBSE is the review of design.
Yes Happy Canada Day and 4th of July to all. This is big celebration week in Detroit/Windsor.
Does anyone else have the review of work products from MBSE, and some think their update is correct and completed(cascaded or reused). But its not in the model, some get this difference in work and others are working in the products and document yet.
For one of the prior slides risk management was the challlenger example, how is MBSE process finding risk beyond other methods of FMEA, HARA, etc.
Another approach is to introduce linked open data modeled around scenarios
The concept of "capability" is also promoted by Charles Wasson.
Functional safety (ISO 26262) can be a scenario and event discussion in MBSE. It has the HARA, Safety goals, Functional safety concept, Technical safety requirements but these are classified from severity, exposure and control charts to an ASIL. It management of the process and how to be “safe”. Not a risk approach of FMEA is my opinion.
I think I agree with that Mac.
What is the difference between Mode and State in Capella?
Are there any built in profiles from architecture frameworks? Can you develop your own profiles?
Thank you Stephane
nice talk! Thank you!
Thanks Stephane and all! Enjoyed the presentation and hearing how the chapters are working over in the states!